{"id":2170,"date":"2026-09-28T20:53:46","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:53:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/?p=2170"},"modified":"2026-09-28T20:53:46","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:53:46","slug":"tehdit-sucu-yargitay-karari-sikayetten-vazgecme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/index.php\/2026\/09\/28\/tehdit-sucu-yargitay-karari-sikayetten-vazgecme\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 2026: Tehdit Davas\u0131nda H\u00fck\u00fcm Kesinle\u015fmeden \u015eik\u00e2yetten Vazge\u00e7ilirse Dava D\u00fc\u015fer mi?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Son kontrol:

H\u00fck\u00fcm verildikten sonra gelen \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7menin davay\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeyece\u011fi, 10.02.2026 tarihli bir tehdit su\u00e7u yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131n merkezindeki sorudur. Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi, h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden yap\u0131lan vazge\u00e7menin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi ve mahk\u00fbmiyeti kanun yarar\u0131na bozarak davay\u0131 kendisi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n

Karar k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir usul meselesi gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnse de sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck. Tehdidin her t\u00fcr\u00fc \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fil; hangi s\u00f6z\u00fcn hangi f\u0131kraya girdi\u011fi, vazge\u00e7menin i\u015fe yaray\u0131p yaramayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirliyor. \u00dcstelik 7550 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun 2025’te TCK 106’n\u0131n cezalar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirdi. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da karar\u0131, tehdit t\u00fcrleri aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131 ve g\u00fcncel kanun metnini birlikte ele al\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n

\n

Karar\u0131n k\u00fcnyesi<\/p>\n

\n
Mahkeme<\/dt>\n
Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi<\/dd>\n
Esas \/ Karar<\/dt>\n
2025\/11114 E., 2026\/2954 K.<\/dd>\n
Karar tarihi<\/dt>\n
10.02.2026<\/dd>\n
Konu<\/dt>\n
\u015eik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 tehdit (TCK 106\/1 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmle) ve hakarette h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7me (TCK 73\/4)<\/dd>\n
Sonu\u00e7<\/dt>\n
Kanun yarar\u0131na bozma; kamu davalar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesi<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n
\nBu yaz\u0131da neler var?<\/summary>\n
    \n
  1. Olay ve su\u00e7lama: hakaret ve “sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck” tehdidi<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. Asliye ceza mahkemesi nas\u0131l karar verdi, vazge\u00e7me neden dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131?<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Tehdit su\u00e7u yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Daire vazge\u00e7meyi nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirdi?<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Tehdit su\u00e7unda cezalar ve 7550 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi nedir?<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Tehdit su\u00e7u yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 okur i\u00e7in ne anlama geliyor?<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Tehdit ve \u015eik\u00e2yetten Vazge\u00e7me Hakk\u0131nda Merak Edilenler<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/details>\n

    Olay ve su\u00e7lama: hakaret ve “sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck” tehdidi<\/h2>\n

    San\u0131k, kat\u0131lana y\u00f6nelik tek bir eylemle hem hakaret hem de tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan yarg\u0131land\u0131. Kararda s\u00f6zlerin i\u00e7eri\u011fine yer verilmiyor; ancak tehdit, TCK 106\/1’in \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f. Bu c\u00fcmle, ki\u015fiyi malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla b\u00fcy\u00fck bir zarara u\u011frataca\u011f\u0131ndan veya “sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck” edece\u011finden bahisle tehdit etmeyi d\u00fczenler ve kovu\u015fturmay\u0131 ma\u011fdurun \u015fik\u00e2yetine ba\u011flar.<\/p>\n

    Hayata, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik tehdit ise ayn\u0131 f\u0131kran\u0131n ilk c\u00fcmlesinde yer al\u0131r ve \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bu ayr\u0131m, olay\u0131n geri kalan\u0131n\u0131 anlamak i\u00e7in belirleyici. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131sma girdi\u011fi i\u00e7in, kat\u0131lan\u0131n iradesi davan\u0131n kaderini do\u011frudan etkileyebiliyordu.<\/p>\n

    \"Tehdit
    Karar\u0131n \u00f6zeti: tehditte \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7me<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Asliye ceza mahkemesi nas\u0131l karar verdi, vazge\u00e7me neden dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131?<\/h2>\n

    Amasya 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi davay\u0131 basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcyle, duru\u015fma a\u00e7madan y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc. 24.12.2024 tarihli karar\u0131yla san\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan, TCK 43\/1 ve 62\/1 de uygulanarak adli para cezalar\u0131yla cezaland\u0131rd\u0131. H\u00fck\u00fcm san\u0131\u011fa 17.01.2025’te tebli\u011f edildi.<\/p>\n

    Kat\u0131lan vekili 31.01.2025 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerden vazge\u00e7tiklerini bildirdi. Kararda, bu dilek\u00e7eye ra\u011fmen mahkemenin d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 vermedi\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu h\u00e2liyle kesinle\u015fti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yor. Olay istinaf veya temyiz a\u015famas\u0131ndan ge\u00e7medi\u011fi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, CMK 309 uyar\u0131nca kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yoluna ba\u015fvurdu; Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 da istemi Daireye g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n

    Tehdit su\u00e7u yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Daire vazge\u00e7meyi nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirdi?<\/h2>\n

    Daire \u00f6nce kanun metinlerini s\u0131ralad\u0131: hakaret TCK 131\/1 uyar\u0131nca, “sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck” tehdidi de TCK 106\/1 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmle uyar\u0131nca \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. TCK 73\/4’e g\u00f6re \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 su\u00e7larda su\u00e7tan zarar g\u00f6renin vazge\u00e7mesi davay\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr; h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden sonraki vazge\u00e7me ise yaln\u0131zca cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na engel olmaz. CMK 223\/8 de d\u00fc\u015fme sebebi varsa d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmesini emreder.<\/p>\n

    \u015fikayetten vazge\u00e7menin karar kesinle\u015finceye kadar m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmas\u0131, karar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa 17.01.2025 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesi, \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilinin 31.01.2025 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki \u015fikayetlerinden vazge\u00e7tiklerini bildirmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; \u015fikayetten vazge\u00e7me tarihinde karar\u0131n hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi ve d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Vazge\u00e7menin sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmas\u0131 i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011f\u0131n buna kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 gerekir (TCK 73\/6). Daire bu noktay\u0131 da kontrol etti: san\u0131k, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine ili\u015fkin dilek\u00e7esinde d\u00fc\u015fme talebinin yerinde oldu\u011funu bildirmi\u015fti. Bu nedenle vazge\u00e7meyi kabul etmi\u015f say\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

    Sonu\u00e7ta Daire, istemi kabul edip h\u00fckm\u00fc CMK 309\/3 uyar\u0131nca bozdu. Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi yeniden yarg\u0131lama gerektirmedi\u011finden 309\/4-d’ye dayanarak kamu davalar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine kendisi karar verdi ve yarg\u0131lama giderini Hazine \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakt\u0131.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Destek almak isterseniz:<\/strong> Dosyan\u0131z ceza dosyas\u0131 ile ilgiliyse ilk i\u015f, s\u00fcrelerin ve elinizdeki belgelerin do\u011fru okunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Tebligat\u0131, tutanaklar\u0131 ve varsa yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 bir araya getirerek g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye gelirseniz, hangi yollar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu birlikte de\u011ferlendirebiliriz. Ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar i\u00e7in b\u00fcronun ileti\u015fim bilgileri<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Tehdit su\u00e7unda cezalar ve 7550 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi nedir?<\/h2>\n

    TCK 106\/1 ilk c\u00fcmle, ki\u015fiyi kendisinin veya yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011finden bahisle tehdit etmeyi alt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131r. 7406 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen ikinci c\u00fcmleye g\u00f6re su\u00e7 kad\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenirse alt s\u0131n\u0131r dokuz aydan az olamaz. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmledeki malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck tehdidinde ceza, \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine, iki aydan alt\u0131 aya kadar hapis veya adli parad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    106\/2; silahla, ki\u015finin kendini tan\u0131nmayacak h\u00e2le koymas\u0131yla, imzas\u0131z mektupla veya \u00f6zel i\u015faretlerle, birden fazla ki\u015fiyle birlikte ya da su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin korkutucu g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yararlan\u0131larak i\u015flenen tehdidi iki y\u0131ldan yedi y\u0131la kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131r. 106\/3’e g\u00f6re tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, yaralama veya mala zarar verme i\u015flenirse bu su\u00e7lardan ayr\u0131ca ceza verilir.<\/p>\n

    04.06.2025’te y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7550 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun iki de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapt\u0131: \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmleye “iki aydan” alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 eklendi, 106\/2’deki \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r be\u015f y\u0131ldan yedi y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131. De\u011fi\u015fiklik aleyhe oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bu tarihten \u00f6nce i\u015flenen tehditlerde TCK 7\/2 uyar\u0131nca eski, lehe metin uygulan\u0131r. \u0130ncelenen dosyadaki h\u00fck\u00fcm 2024 tarihli oldu\u011fundan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten etkilenmedi.<\/p>\n

    Pratikte bu, 2025 ortas\u0131ndan \u00f6nceki bir silahla tehdit olay\u0131nda cezan\u0131n be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k eski \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rla, sonraki olaylarda ise yedi y\u0131ll\u0131k yeni \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rla hesaplanaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir. Sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck tehdidinde de alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n iki aya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131, su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re farkl\u0131 bir temel ceza do\u011furabilir. Bu y\u00fczden iddianamede ve h\u00fck\u00fcmde su\u00e7 tarihinin do\u011fru tespit edilmesi, cezan\u0131n hesab\u0131 kadar \u00f6nemlidir.<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Tehdit t\u00fcr\u00fc<\/th>\nCeza (g\u00fcncel metin)<\/th>\n\u015eik\u00e2yet<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Hayat, v\u00fccut, cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131k<\/td>\n6 ay \u2013 2 y\u0131l hapis<\/td>\nGerekmez<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Ayn\u0131 tehdit kad\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131<\/td>\nAlt s\u0131n\u0131r 9 ay<\/td>\nGerekmez<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck<\/td>\n2 ay \u2013 6 ay hapis veya APC<\/td>\nGerekir<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Silahla, birden fazla ki\u015fiyle vb.<\/td>\n2 \u2013 7 y\u0131l hapis<\/td>\nGerekmez<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
    \"Tehdit
    Tehdit dosyas\u0131nda \u015fik\u00e2yet ve vazge\u00e7me<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Silahla tehditte aleyhe de\u011fi\u015ftirme yasa\u011f\u0131<\/h3>\n

    Ayn\u0131 Dairenin 16.02.2026 tarihli, 2025\/12344 E., 2026\/3361 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da nitelikli tehdit bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6\u011fretici. Yerel mahkeme, silahla tehdit su\u00e7unda TCK 43\/2 art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 yaparken sonu\u00e7 cezay\u0131 2 y\u0131l 6 ay yerine 1 y\u0131l 6 ay olarak hesaplam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Daire hatay\u0131 tespit etti ama aleyhe temyiz bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in san\u0131klar\u0131n cezas\u0131n\u0131 art\u0131ramayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti ve h\u00fckm\u00fc d\u00fczelterek onad\u0131.<\/p>\n

    Tehdit su\u00e7u yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 okur i\u00e7in ne anlama geliyor?<\/h2>\n

    \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ilk ders \u015fu: taraflar\u0131n bar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir dosyada vazge\u00e7me, h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fene kadar sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilir. Kesinle\u015fmeden sonra verilen dilek\u00e7e ise cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131 durdurmaz. Vazge\u00e7me dilek\u00e7esini h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011f tarihini ve itiraz ya da istinaf s\u00fcresini g\u00f6zeterek vermek gerekir.<\/p>\n

    San\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da \u00f6nemli bir ayr\u0131nt\u0131 var: vazge\u00e7me, onu kabul etmeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131 etkilemez. Beraat bekleyen bir san\u0131k vazge\u00e7meye kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kabilir; kabul etti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bildirmesi ise d\u00fc\u015fmenin yolunu a\u00e7ar. Hangi tehdidin \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu s\u00f6z\u00fcn i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re belirlendi\u011finden, bu ayr\u0131m\u0131n iddianamede do\u011fru yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da incelemek gerekir.<\/p>\n

    Tehdidin unsurlar\u0131, mesajla tehdit ve cezalar\u0131 i\u00e7in TCK 106 rehberimize<\/a>, silah\u0131n niteli\u011fi g\u00fcndeme geliyorsa 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun<\/a> yaz\u0131s\u0131na, hakaret boyutu i\u00e7in \u015ferefe kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar<\/a> yaz\u0131s\u0131na bakabilirsiniz.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Tehdidin t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc belirleyin.<\/strong> S\u00f6z hayata veya v\u00fccuda m\u0131, yoksa malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ya da “sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe” mi y\u00f6neliyor?<\/li>\n
    2. \u015eik\u00e2yet s\u00fcresini g\u00f6zetin.<\/strong> \u015eik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 tehditte alt\u0131 ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre, fiil ve failin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi g\u00fcnden ba\u015flar.<\/li>\n
    3. Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma a\u015famas\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirin.<\/strong> 106\/1’deki tehdit, \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/li>\n
    4. Vazge\u00e7meyi zaman\u0131nda bildirin.<\/strong> Dilek\u00e7e h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden mahkemeye ula\u015fmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/li>\n
    5. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131n.<\/strong> Vazge\u00e7menin sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmas\u0131 i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 gerekir.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n

      Dikkat:<\/strong> CMK 253\/3’e g\u00f6re uzla\u015ft\u0131rmaya tabi bir su\u00e7, kapsam d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki bir su\u00e7la birlikte ayn\u0131 ma\u011fdura kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenirse uzla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmaz. 7571 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla (y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck 25.12.2025) eklenen c\u00fcmleye g\u00f6re ise \u00f6n\u00f6deme kapsam\u0131ndaki bir su\u00e7la birlikte i\u015flenen uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131ndaki su\u00e7 i\u00e7in uzla\u015fma yap\u0131l\u0131r. Hakaret art\u0131k b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u00f6n\u00f6deme kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011fundan, hakaret ve tehdidin birlikte i\u015flendi\u011fi dosyalarda tehdit i\u00e7in uzla\u015ft\u0131rma yeniden g\u00fcndeme gelebilir. Ayr\u0131nt\u0131 i\u00e7in uzla\u015ft\u0131rma ve seri muhakeme<\/a> sayfas\u0131na bakabilirsiniz.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      \"TCK
      Tehdit t\u00fcrleri ve \u015fik\u00e2yet \u015fart\u0131<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

      Tehdit ve \u015eik\u00e2yetten Vazge\u00e7me Hakk\u0131nda Merak Edilenler<\/h2>\n
      \n
      \nTehdit su\u00e7unda \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7ilirse dava d\u00fc\u015fer mi?<\/summary>\n

      Tehdidin t\u00fcr\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya “sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe” y\u00f6nelik tehdit \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden yap\u0131lan vazge\u00e7me davay\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr. Hayata, v\u00fccuda veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik tehditte ya da silahla tehditte \u015fik\u00e2yet \u015fart\u0131 yoktur; vazge\u00e7me davay\u0131 sona erdirmez.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nH\u00fck\u00fcm verildikten sonra \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7mek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn m\u00fc?<\/summary>\n

      Evet, h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015finceye kadar m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu kararda h\u00fck\u00fcm tebli\u011f edildikten sonra, kesinle\u015fmeden \u00f6nce verilen vazge\u00e7me dilek\u00e7esi dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in karar kanun yarar\u0131na bozuldu. Kesinle\u015fmeden sonra yap\u0131lan vazge\u00e7me ise TCK 73\/4 gere\u011fi cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na engel olmaz.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nSilahla tehdidin cezas\u0131 7550 ile ne kadar oldu?<\/summary>\n

      Silahla tehdidin cezas\u0131 iki y\u0131ldan yedi y\u0131la kadar hapis oldu. 7550 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun 04.06.2025’ten itibaren \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 be\u015f y\u0131ldan yediye \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131. Bu tarihten \u00f6nce i\u015flenen silahla tehditte, lehe kanun ilkesi gere\u011fi eski \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r olan be\u015f y\u0131l esas al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nSan\u0131k \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7meye itiraz edebilir mi?<\/summary>\n

      Evet, edebilir. TCK 73\/6’ya g\u00f6re kanunda aksi yaz\u0131l\u0131 olmad\u0131k\u00e7a vazge\u00e7me onu kabul etmeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131 etkilemez. Beraat edece\u011fine inanan bir san\u0131k vazge\u00e7meyi reddedebilir ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcrmesini isteyebilir. Bu kararda san\u0131k d\u00fc\u015fme talebini yerinde buldu\u011funu bildirdi\u011fi i\u00e7in vazge\u00e7me sonu\u00e7 do\u011furdu.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nKanun yarar\u0131na bozma nedir, kim ba\u015fvurabilir?<\/summary>\n

      Kanun yarar\u0131na bozma, istinaf veya temyiz incelemesinden ge\u00e7meden kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir karardaki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi yoludur. Ba\u015fvuru Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na yap\u0131l\u0131r; taraflar do\u011frudan ba\u015fvuramaz, Bakanl\u0131\u011fa dilek\u00e7eyle durumu bildirebilir. Bu dosyada Daire bozmayla birlikte d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131n\u0131 da kendisi verdi.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n

      \n

      Dayanak mevzuat ve karar<\/p>\n