{"id":2080,"date":"2026-09-28T20:34:06","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:34:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/?p=2080"},"modified":"2026-09-28T20:34:06","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:34:06","slug":"mesru-mudafaa-sinirinin-asilmasi-yargitay-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/index.php\/2026\/09\/28\/mesru-mudafaa-sinirinin-asilmasi-yargitay-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK: Bir At\u0131\u015fa On Be\u015f At\u0131\u015fla Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k Veren San\u0131\u011fa Neden Ceza Verilmedi? (TCK 27\/2)"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Son kontrol:

Me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 denince akla gelen soru basittir: kendini savunan biri gere\u011finden fazla g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131rsa ne olur? Ceza Genel Kurulunun 17 Aral\u0131k 2025 tarihli karar\u0131, bir kez t\u00fcfekle vurulan ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda on be\u015f el ate\u015f eden san\u0131k i\u00e7in cevab\u0131 TCK 27\/2’de buldu: savunma orant\u0131s\u0131zd\u0131 ama san\u0131\u011fa ceza verilemez.<\/p>\n

Kanunun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 terim “me\u015fru savunma”, g\u00fcndelik dilde ve aramalarda ise “me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa”. \u0130kisi ayn\u0131 kurumu anlat\u0131r. Bu karar\u0131 \u00f6nemli k\u0131lan, \u00fc\u00e7 ayr\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn (beraat, ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, haks\u0131z tahrik indirimi) Genel Kurulda neredeyse e\u015fit a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kla savunulmu\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n

\n

Karar\u0131n k\u00fcnyesi<\/p>\n

\n
Mahkeme<\/dt>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/dd>\n
Esas \/ Karar<\/dt>\n
2023\/556 E., 2025\/585 K.<\/dd>\n
Karar tarihi<\/dt>\n
17.12.2025<\/dd>\n
Konu<\/dt>\n
Me\u015fru savunmada orant\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, mazur g\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek korku ve tela\u015f (TCK 27\/2)<\/dd>\n
Sonu\u00e7<\/dt>\n
Bozma (itiraz de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle kabul edildi)<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n
\nBu yaz\u0131da neler var?<\/summary>\n
    \n
  1. Olay ve su\u00e7lama: ba\u011f evinden soka\u011fa uzanan bir gece<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. A\u011f\u0131r ceza ve istinaf beraat verdi, Yarg\u0131tay dairesi onad\u0131<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Genel Kurul neden ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi?<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Genel Kurul neden b\u00f6l\u00fcnd\u00fc?<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nelerdir?<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 kendini savunan biri i\u00e7in ne ifade ediyor?<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa ve s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda s\u0131k sorulanlar<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/details>\n

    Olay ve su\u00e7lama: ba\u011f evinden soka\u011fa uzanan bir gece<\/h2>\n

    Olay Eyl\u00fcl 2016’da Bal\u0131kesir’in Edremit il\u00e7esinde ge\u00e7iyor. Birbirini tan\u0131yan iki arkada\u015f, iki ortak arkada\u015flar\u0131yla birlikte kat\u0131lana ait ba\u011f evinde i\u00e7ki i\u00e7erken tart\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. San\u0131k kat\u0131lana tokat at\u0131yor ve b\u0131\u00e7ak do\u011frultuyor, kat\u0131lan da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131na \u015fi\u015feyle vuruyor. Tan\u0131klar taraflar\u0131 ay\u0131r\u0131yor ve san\u0131k motosikletiyle oradan ayr\u0131l\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    Genel Kurulun kabul\u00fcne g\u00f6re kat\u0131lan, uzakla\u015fan san\u0131\u011fa evdeki av t\u00fcfe\u011fiyle yakla\u015f\u0131k seksen metreden ate\u015f ediyor ve onu ba\u015f\u0131ndan ve s\u0131rt\u0131ndan yaral\u0131yor. San\u0131k kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vermeden il\u00e7e merkezine gidiyor. Bir s\u00fcre sonra evde kalan e\u015fyas\u0131n\u0131 almak i\u00e7in tan\u0131klardan birini g\u00f6nderiyor. Kat\u0131lan, e\u015fyay\u0131 bizzat vermek istedi\u011fini s\u00f6yleyip reddedilince bu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 gizlice takip ediyor, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yere geliyor ve ara\u00e7 i\u00e7inden t\u00fcfekle bir kez daha ate\u015f ederek san\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131ndan, boynundan ve kolundan yaral\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    G\u00f6z \u00e7evresinden yaralanan ve karanl\u0131kta net g\u00f6remeyen san\u0131k \u00f6nce tabancas\u0131yla hedef g\u00f6zetmeden sekiz el, mermisi bitince arac\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 av t\u00fcfe\u011fiyle yedi el daha ate\u015f ediyor. Kat\u0131lan bir g\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc kaybediyor, y\u00fcz\u00fcnde sabit iz kal\u0131yor ve ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye sokan yaralar al\u0131yor. San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcsten dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    A\u011f\u0131r ceza ve istinaf beraat verdi, Yarg\u0131tay dairesi onad\u0131<\/h2>\n

    A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n me\u015fru savunma i\u00e7inde hareket etti\u011fini kabul ederek TCK 25\/1 ve CMK 223\/2-d uyar\u0131nca beraat karar\u0131 veriyor. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi, h\u00fckme tazminat hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir hat\u0131rlatma ekleyerek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu esastan reddediyor. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi de h\u00fckm\u00fc oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla onuyor.<\/p>\n

    Dairenin iki \u00fcyesi kar\u015f\u0131 oy yaz\u0131yor: onlara g\u00f6re me\u015fru savunma ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve san\u0131k kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcsten cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131yd\u0131. Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 da itiraz ediyor. \u0130tiraza g\u00f6re ilk ate\u015fin kimden geldi\u011fi kesin de\u011fildi; kald\u0131 ki kat\u0131lan\u0131n tek at\u0131\u015f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 on be\u015f at\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrme ihtimali bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ate\u015f devam etmi\u015fti. Daire itiraz\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6rmeyince dosya Ceza Genel Kuruluna gidiyor.<\/p>\n

    \"Me\u015fru
    Karar\u0131n \u00f6zeti: CGK 2023\/556 E., 2025\/585 K.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Genel Kurul neden ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi?<\/h2>\n

    Genel Kurul \u00f6nce me\u015fru savunman\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 iki grupta topluyor. Sald\u0131r\u0131ya ili\u015fkin \u015fartlar: bir sald\u0131r\u0131 bulunmal\u0131, haks\u0131z olmal\u0131, korunabilir bir hakka y\u00f6nelmeli ve savunmayla e\u015f zamanl\u0131 olmal\u0131. Savunmaya ili\u015fkin \u015fartlar: savunma zorunlu olmal\u0131, sald\u0131rana y\u00f6nelmeli ve sald\u0131r\u0131yla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131. Orant\u0131 a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda me\u015fru savunma art\u0131k tam olarak kabul edilemiyor; ama s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri g\u00fcndeme geliyor.<\/p>\n

    Karar, iki f\u0131kra aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koyuyor. TCK 27\/1’de s\u0131n\u0131r kast olmaks\u0131z\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa fail taksirli su\u00e7 cezas\u0131n\u0131n indirilmi\u015f h\u00e2liyle sorumlu tutuluyor. TCK 27\/2’de ise me\u015fru savunmaya \u00f6zg\u00fc bir kural var: s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 mazur g\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek heyecan, korku veya tela\u015ftan kaynaklan\u0131yorsa faile ceza verilmiyor. Genel Kurula g\u00f6re burada s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n kasten a\u015f\u0131l\u0131p a\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yor; belirleyici olan, sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fiyi soktu\u011fu ruh h\u00e2li.<\/p>\n

    …sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n etkisinin yan\u0131nda, sald\u0131r\u0131dan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, \u00f6fke gibi nedenlerle s\u0131n\u0131r a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ise ayn\u0131 korumadan faydalan\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Somut olayda Genel Kurul, sald\u0131r\u0131 ve savunmaya ili\u015fkin di\u011fer \u015fartlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini kabul ediyor; ancak bir kez ate\u015f eden kat\u0131lana iki farkl\u0131 silahla toplam on be\u015f kez ate\u015f eden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131nda orant\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ediyor. Ard\u0131ndan belirleyici de\u011ferlendirmeyi yap\u0131yor:<\/p>\n

    …kat\u0131landan korkan ve tekrar sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, me\u015fru savunmaya ili\u015fkin \u015fartlardan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ya da orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131, mazur g\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek bir heyecan, korku ve tela\u015f ile a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc zorunludur.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    H\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131 buna g\u00f6re \u015fekilleniyor: san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda CMK 223\/3-c uyar\u0131nca ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekirken beraat verilmesi isabetsiz. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesinin karar\u0131 bu nedenle bozuluyor. Genel Kurul, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6fkeyle hareket etti\u011fine dair bir tespit bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc de uygun g\u00f6rm\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Destek almak isterseniz:<\/strong> Dosyan\u0131z ceza dosyas\u0131 ile ilgiliyse ilk i\u015f, s\u00fcrelerin ve elinizdeki belgelerin do\u011fru okunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Tebligat\u0131, tutanaklar\u0131 ve varsa yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 bir araya getirerek g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye gelirseniz, hangi yollar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu birlikte de\u011ferlendirebiliriz. Ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar i\u00e7in b\u00fcronun ileti\u015fim bilgileri<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Genel Kurul neden b\u00f6l\u00fcnd\u00fc?<\/h2>\n

    Karar ilk m\u00fczakerede yeterli \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu bulamad\u0131; 17.12.2025’teki ikinci m\u00fczakerede oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Sekiz \u00fcye san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haks\u0131z tahrik alt\u0131nda hareket etti\u011fini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla itiraz\u0131n do\u011frudan kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fini savundu. Di\u011fer oylamada yine sekiz \u00fcye, me\u015fru savunma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak olu\u015ftu\u011funu ve ilk derece mahkemesinin beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc.<\/p>\n

    Bu da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m, me\u015fru savunma ile s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve haks\u0131z tahrik aras\u0131ndaki ge\u00e7i\u015flerin ne kadar yak\u0131n oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steriyor. Ayn\u0131 Genel Kurul, 2024\/441 E., 2025\/575 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ve 10.12.2025 tarihli karar\u0131nda, bir kahvehane \u00f6n\u00fcndeki tart\u0131\u015fmada ilk silahl\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 ba\u015flatan ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 ate\u015f eden san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemini sald\u0131r\u0131yla orant\u0131l\u0131 bulmu\u015f ve me\u015fru savunma nedeniyle beraat gerekti\u011fine h\u00fckmetmi\u015fti. O kararda da kar\u015f\u0131 oy vard\u0131.<\/p>\n

    Karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nelerdir?<\/h2>\n

    T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu<\/a> 25\/1, kendisine veya ba\u015fkas\u0131na ait bir hakka y\u00f6nelmi\u015f, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi veya tekrar\u0131 muhakkak olan haks\u0131z bir sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 o anda h\u00e2l ve ko\u015fullara g\u00f6re orant\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde defetme zorunlulu\u011fuyla i\u015flenen fiillerde ceza verilmeyece\u011fini s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. TCK 27 ise s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenliyor. Muhakeme taraf\u0131nda Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu 223 iki farkl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm t\u00fcr\u00fc \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Durum<\/th>\nKanun h\u00fckm\u00fc<\/th>\nVerilecek karar<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Me\u015fru savunma \u015fartlar\u0131 tam<\/td>\nTCK 25\/1<\/td>\nBeraat (CMK 223\/2-d)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    S\u0131n\u0131r korku veya tela\u015fla a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131<\/td>\nTCK 27\/2<\/td>\nCeza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (223\/3-c)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    S\u0131n\u0131r kast olmaks\u0131z\u0131n a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131<\/td>\nTCK 27\/1<\/td>\nTaksirli su\u00e7 cezas\u0131ndan indirimli mahk\u00fbmiyet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Sald\u0131r\u0131 bitmi\u015f, \u00f6fkeyle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k<\/td>\nTCK 29<\/td>\nHaks\u0131z tahrik indirimiyle mahk\u00fbmiyet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    Beraat karar\u0131nda fiil hukuka uygun say\u0131l\u0131r; ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131nda ise fiil hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 kal\u0131r ama fail kusurlu g\u00f6r\u00fclmez. Genel Kurul da s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n bir hukuka uygunluk nedeni olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kusuru azaltan veya kald\u0131ran bir neden oldu\u011funu vurguluyor.<\/p>\n

    \"Me\u015fru
    TCK 27\/2 i\u00e7in aranan d\u00f6rt \u015fart<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 kendini savunan biri i\u00e7in ne ifade ediyor?<\/h2>\n

    \u0130lk ders: savunman\u0131n orant\u0131s\u0131z kalmas\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na mahk\u00fbmiyet demek de\u011fil. Sald\u0131r\u0131 s\u00fcr\u00fcyorsa ve ki\u015fi ger\u00e7ekten korku ve tela\u015f i\u00e7inde hareket ettiyse, TCK 27\/2 ceza sorumlulu\u011funu kald\u0131rabiliyor. \u0130kinci ders: bu koruma \u00f6fkeyle hareket edene tan\u0131nm\u0131yor. Ayn\u0131 olayda \u00f6fke \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131karsa tart\u0131\u015fma haks\u0131z tahrike kayar ve bu kez indirimli de olsa ceza g\u00fcndeme gelir.<\/p>\n

    Ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131 i\u00e7in ise karar, “ilk kim sald\u0131rd\u0131?” sorusunun ne kadar belirleyici oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steriyor. Sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n tekrar\u0131 muhakkak m\u0131yd\u0131, ki\u015fi ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc korunabilir miydi, ka\u00e7 at\u0131\u015f yap\u0131ld\u0131 ve hangi aral\u0131kla? Bu sorular\u0131n cevab\u0131 dosyadaki bilirki\u015fi ve olay yeri raporlar\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yor. Hata h\u00e2linde me\u015fru savunma, yani sald\u0131r\u0131 yokken varm\u0131\u015f gibi alg\u0131lanmas\u0131 ise ayr\u0131 bir kurum; bunun i\u00e7in hata h\u00e2linde su\u00e7<\/a> yaz\u0131s\u0131na bak\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n zaman\u0131n\u0131 belirleyin.<\/strong> Sald\u0131r\u0131 sona ermi\u015fse me\u015fru savunma de\u011fil, en fazla haks\u0131z tahrik tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r.<\/li>\n
    2. Ka\u00e7ma veya korunma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131n.<\/strong> Savunman\u0131n zorunlu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fka yolla korunma olana\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131larak de\u011ferlendirilir.<\/li>\n
    3. Orant\u0131y\u0131 somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131n.<\/strong> Kullan\u0131lan silahlar, at\u0131\u015f say\u0131s\u0131 ve mesafe bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131yla ortaya konmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/li>\n
    4. Ruh h\u00e2lini delillendirin.<\/strong> Yaralanma, karanl\u0131k, \u00f6nceki sald\u0131r\u0131 gibi korku ve tela\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan olgular dosyaya girmelidir.<\/li>\n
    5. H\u00fck\u00fcm t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc kontrol edin.<\/strong> Beraat ile ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n fark\u0131 kanun yolunda ayr\u0131ca ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n

      Dikkat:<\/strong> Bu dosyada ilk derece, istinaf ve Yarg\u0131tay dairesi beraat karar\u0131nda birle\u015fmi\u015fti; h\u00fck\u00fcm ancak Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n itiraz\u0131yla de\u011fi\u015fti. 31.07.2026’da y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7589 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla CMK 308’deki itiraz s\u00fcresi dosyan\u0131n Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa tesliminden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay olarak d\u00fczenlendi; san\u0131k lehine itirazda s\u00fcre aranm\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      Yaralama su\u00e7unun cezalar\u0131 i\u00e7in kasten yaralama rehberimize<\/a>, beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcrleri ve tazminat hakk\u0131 i\u00e7in beraat karar\u0131 yaz\u0131m\u0131za<\/a> bakabilirsiniz. Te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn genel kurallar\u0131 su\u00e7a te\u015febb\u00fcs<\/a> yaz\u0131s\u0131nda anlat\u0131l\u0131yor. A\u011f\u0131r ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 i\u00e7in a\u011f\u0131r ceza davalar\u0131<\/a> sayfas\u0131 da bir ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 noktas\u0131.<\/p>\n

      \"Me\u015fru
      Savunma durumuna g\u00f6re verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcm<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

      Me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa ve s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda s\u0131k sorulanlar<\/h2>\n
      \n
      \nMe\u015fru m\u00fcdafaada s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 a\u015fan ki\u015fi ceza al\u0131r m\u0131?<\/summary>\n

      Duruma g\u00f6re al\u0131r veya almaz. S\u0131n\u0131r mazur g\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek heyecan, korku veya tela\u015fla a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ysa TCK 27\/2 gere\u011fi ceza verilmez. Bu ko\u015ful yoksa ve s\u0131n\u0131r kast olmaks\u0131z\u0131n a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ysa, fiil taksirle de cezaland\u0131r\u0131labiliyorsa TCK 27\/1 uyar\u0131nca taksirli su\u00e7 cezas\u0131 indirilerek uygulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nMe\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa ile haks\u0131z tahrik aras\u0131ndaki fark nedir?<\/summary>\n

      Me\u015fru savunmada h\u00e2len s\u00fcren bir sald\u0131r\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 zorunlu olarak kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k verilir; haks\u0131z tahrikte ise sona ermi\u015f bir haks\u0131z fiilin yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6fkeyle hareket edilir. Ceza Genel Kurulu bu kararda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n korkuyla hareket etti\u011fini, \u00f6fkenin belirleyici olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti ve haks\u0131z tahriki uygulamad\u0131.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nBeraat ile ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 ayn\u0131 \u015fey mi?<\/summary>\n

      Hay\u0131r, ayn\u0131 \u015fey de\u011fil. Beraatte fiil hukuka uygun say\u0131l\u0131r; CMK 223\/2-d me\u015fru savunmada bu karar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcr. Ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131nda fiil hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 kal\u0131r ama failin kusuru bulunmaz. CMK 223\/3-c, me\u015fru savunmada s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n heyecan, korku ve tela\u015fla a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 bu gruba koyar.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nKa\u00e7 at\u0131\u015f yap\u0131l\u0131rsa orant\u0131 a\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olur?<\/summary>\n

      Kanunda sabit bir say\u0131 yok; orant\u0131 olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilir. Bu dosyada tek at\u0131\u015fa kar\u015f\u0131 iki silahla on be\u015f at\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 orant\u0131s\u0131z bulundu. Ba\u015fka bir Genel Kurul karar\u0131nda ise silahl\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131ya ate\u015fle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vermek orant\u0131l\u0131 say\u0131ld\u0131. Belirleyici olan sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve s\u00fcr\u00fcp s\u00fcrmedi\u011fidir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n

      \n

      Dayanak mevzuat ve karar<\/p>\n