{"id":2062,"date":"2026-09-28T20:30:06","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/?p=2062"},"modified":"2026-09-28T20:30:06","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:30:06","slug":"dolandiricilik-hukuki-ihtilaf-yargitay-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/index.php\/2026\/09\/28\/dolandiricilik-hukuki-ihtilaf-yargitay-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 2026: Yat\u0131r\u0131m ve Ticari \u0130li\u015fkide Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k m\u0131, Hukuki \u0130htilaf m\u0131?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Son kontrol:

Paras\u0131 geri \u00f6denmeyen herkes doland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmaz; ama her \u00f6denmeyen bor\u00e7 da “hukuki ihtilaf” diye savc\u0131l\u0131ktan \u00e7evrilemez. \u015eubat 2026 tarihli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k hukuki ihtilaf yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131, bu ikisini ay\u0131rman\u0131n ilk ad\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131rma oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. Borsada yat\u0131r\u0131m vaadiyle 810.000 TL topland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen bir dosyada savc\u0131l\u0131k “taraflar aras\u0131nda alacak-bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkisi var” deyip soru\u015fturmay\u0131 kapatm\u0131\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi ise karar\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozmu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 ayr\u0131m, Ceza Genel Kurulunun yine \u015eubat 2026’da verdi\u011fi bir kararda ticari bir sipari\u015f ili\u015fkisi \u00fczerinden tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Temmuz 2026’da ise Daire, fatura fiyatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fi\u015firildi\u011fi bir \u015firketler aras\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta su\u00e7un tamamlan\u0131p tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 inceledi. Bu yaz\u0131da \u00fc\u00e7 karar\u0131, ticari ili\u015fki ve yat\u0131r\u0131m vaadi i\u00e7eren doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k \u015fik\u00e2yetleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan birlikte de\u011ferlendiriyoruz.<\/p>\n

\n

Karar\u0131n k\u00fcnyesi<\/p>\n

\n
Mahkeme<\/dt>\n
Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi<\/dd>\n
Esas \/ Karar<\/dt>\n
2025\/4543 E., 2026\/1074 K.<\/dd>\n
Karar tarihi<\/dt>\n
02.02.2026<\/dd>\n
Konu<\/dt>\n
Borsa yat\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 vaadiyle para toplama iddias\u0131nda “hukuki ihtilaf” gerek\u00e7eli kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 (TCK 158\/1-h)<\/dd>\n
Sonu\u00e7<\/dt>\n
Kanun yarar\u0131na bozma (oy birli\u011fi)<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n
\nBu yaz\u0131da neler var?<\/summary>\n
    \n
  1. Olay: ayl\u0131k y\u00fczde 25 kazan\u00e7 vaadi ve 810.000 TL<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. Savc\u0131l\u0131k ve sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi neden dosyay\u0131 kapatt\u0131?<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k hukuki ihtilaf yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Daire neyi eksik buldu?<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Ceza Genel Kurulu ticari ili\u015fkide nas\u0131l bakt\u0131?<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Kararlar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nelerdir?<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Su\u00e7 tamamlanmad\u0131ysa ne olur?<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k hukuki ihtilaf yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 okura ne anlat\u0131yor?<\/a><\/li>\n
  8. S\u0131k sorulan sorular<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/details>\n

    Olay: ayl\u0131k y\u00fczde 25 kazan\u00e7 vaadi ve 810.000 TL<\/h2>\n

    Kararda aktar\u0131lan iddiaya g\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcpheliler, i\u015fitme ve konu\u015fma engelli olan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7iye borsada yat\u0131r\u0131m yaparak para kazand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 anlat\u0131yor. Para g\u00f6nderirse ayl\u0131k y\u00fczde 25 oran\u0131nda kazan\u00e7 elde edece\u011fini s\u00f6yl\u00fcyorlar. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i farkl\u0131 bankalardaki hesaplar\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelilerden birinin hesaplar\u0131na toplam 810.000 TL g\u00f6nderiyor.<\/p>\n

    \u015e\u00fcpheli iki \u00fc\u00e7 ay boyunca \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7iye baz\u0131 \u00f6demeler yap\u0131yor, sonra \u00f6demeler duruyor. Ana para istendi\u011finde i\u015flerin ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiye devredildi\u011fi, \u00f6demeleri art\u0131k onun yapaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6yleniyor. Bu a\u015famada taraflar aras\u0131nda bir “finans yat\u0131r\u0131m dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi” de imzalan\u0131yor. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i, benzer \u015fekilde \u00e7ok say\u0131da i\u015fitme engelli ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ntemle doland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

    \"Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k
    Karar\u0131n \u00f6zeti: borsa vaadi ve hukuki ihtilaf<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Savc\u0131l\u0131k ve sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi neden dosyay\u0131 kapatt\u0131?<\/h2>\n

    \u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 25.05.2024 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verdi. Gerek\u00e7eye g\u00f6re \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i paras\u0131n\u0131 kendi iradesiyle, riskli bir yat\u0131r\u0131m arac\u0131 olan borsada de\u011ferlendirilmek \u00fczere g\u00f6ndermi\u015fti. \u015e\u00fcphelilerin denetim imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131ran “a\u011f\u0131r, yo\u011fun ve ustaca” bir hile kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair delil yoktu.<\/p>\n

    Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6re as\u0131l mesele k\u00e2r-zarar i\u00e7eren \u00f6zel hukuk i\u015flemlerinden do\u011fan bir alacak-bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkisiydi. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i paras\u0131n\u0131 icra dairesinde veya hukuk mahkemesinde isteyebilirdi. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 02.07.2024 tarihinde itiraz\u0131 reddetti ve karar kesinle\u015fti. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 01.10.2025 tarihinde kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istedi.<\/p>\n

    Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k hukuki ihtilaf yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Daire neyi eksik buldu?<\/h2>\n

    Daire, “hukuki ihtilaf” sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 s\u0131ral\u0131yor. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i ad\u0131na ger\u00e7ekten borsada yat\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ve an\u0131lan \u015firketin banka ve kripto para hesap bilgileri getirtilmeliydi. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7inin sundu\u011fu flash belle\u011fin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda benzer dosyalar varsa bunlar incelenmeliydi.<\/p>\n

    “…hatal\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle eksik soru\u015fturma neticesinde verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz \u00fczerine soru\u015fturman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesine karar verilmesi yerine itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi Kanun’a ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Karar\u0131n mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fu: Bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ya da ilk aylarda baz\u0131 \u00f6demeler yap\u0131lmas\u0131, olay\u0131 kendili\u011finden hukuk alan\u0131na ta\u015f\u0131maz. Belirleyici soru, paran\u0131n vaat edilen yat\u0131r\u0131ma ger\u00e7ekten y\u00f6nelip y\u00f6nelmedi\u011fidir. Para hi\u00e7 borsaya girmemi\u015fse ve ilk \u00f6demeler g\u00fcven kazanmak i\u00e7in yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, ortada bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k de\u011fil, ba\u015ftan kurgulanm\u0131\u015f bir aldatma bulunabilir. Bunu anlaman\u0131n yolu da hesap hareketlerine bakmakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Bozma oy birli\u011fiyle verildi; CMK 309\/4-a gere\u011fi sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi, eksik kalan ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 yapt\u0131rd\u0131ktan sonra itiraz hakk\u0131nda yeniden karar verecek. Kararda \u015f\u00fcphelilerin su\u00e7lu oldu\u011funa dair bir tespit yok; yaln\u0131zca ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmadan verilmi\u015f bir takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131n ayakta kalamayaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6yleniyor.<\/p>\n

    Ceza Genel Kurulu ticari ili\u015fkide nas\u0131l bakt\u0131?<\/h2>\n

    Ceza Genel Kurulunun 2024\/277 E., 2026\/97 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ve 18.02.2026 tarihinde m\u00fczakere edilen karar\u0131, benzer bir savunmay\u0131 ticari bir sipari\u015f ili\u015fkisinde ele al\u0131yor. \u0130ddiaya g\u00f6re bir giyim \u015firketi ad\u0131na hareket eden san\u0131k, kat\u0131lan tekstil \u015firketine kamu ihalelerine girdiklerini ve Milli Savunma Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n nevresim ihalesine kat\u0131lacaklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek 250.000 tak\u0131m nevresim sipari\u015fi verdi.<\/p>\n

    Mallar teslim al\u0131nd\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda verilen \u00e7ekler kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Sonradan yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rmada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015firketinin teklifinin ihalede de\u011ferlendirme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, mallar\u0131n san\u0131klarla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fka \u015firketlere sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu \u015firketlerin adreslerinin birbiriyle ayn\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi ise birka\u00e7 kez beraat karar\u0131 verdi ve son karar\u0131nda olay\u0131n bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k, yani hukuki ihtilaf oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek direndi.<\/p>\n

    Genel Kurul direnmeyi yerinde g\u00f6rmedi. \u00c7ekleri ke\u015fide eden \u015firketin ve mallar\u0131n al\u0131m sat\u0131m\u0131yla ilgili di\u011fer \u015firketlerin ger\u00e7ek bir ticari faaliyeti ve vergi m\u00fckellefiyeti olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ek bedellerini \u00f6deyecek ticari potansiyelleri bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131, ticari defterler getirtilerek uzman bilirki\u015fi heyetinden rapor al\u0131nmal\u0131yd\u0131. Beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma nedeniyle oy birli\u011fiyle bozuldu.<\/p>\n

    \u0130ki karar birlikte okundu\u011funda, hem Dairenin hem Genel Kurulun 2026’da “hukuki ihtilaf” nitelendirmesinden \u00f6nce para ve mal ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n belgelerle izlenmesini istedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

    \"Ticari
    Ticari ili\u015fkide doland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ysan\u0131z<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
    \n

    Karar vermeden \u00f6nce:<\/strong> Bu t\u00fcr dosyalarda, \u00f6zellikle ceza dosyas\u0131 ile ilgili s\u00fcre\u00e7lerde, at\u0131lan tek bir yanl\u0131\u015f ad\u0131m s\u00fcre kayb\u0131na yol a\u00e7abilir. \u0130fade vermeden, bir teklifi kabul etmeden ya da bir karar\u0131 itirazs\u0131z b\u0131rakmadan \u00f6nce belgelerinizi bir avukatla g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irmek size uygun se\u00e7ene\u011fi netle\u015ftirir. Bize ula\u015fmak i\u00e7in b\u00fcronun ileti\u015fim bilgileri<\/a> yeterlidir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Kararlar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nelerdir?<\/h2>\n

    TCK 157, hileli davran\u0131\u015flarla bir kimseyi aldat\u0131p onun veya ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131na yarar sa\u011flamay\u0131 su\u00e7 say\u0131yor. Temel \u015fekil i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yapt\u0131r\u0131m, bir ila be\u015f y\u0131l hapisle birlikte be\u015f bin g\u00fcne varan adli para cezas\u0131. TCK 158\/1-h, su\u00e7un tacir veya \u015firket y\u00f6neticisi olan ya da \u015firket ad\u0131na hareket eden ki\u015filerce ticari faaliyetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015flenmesini nitelikli h\u00e2l olarak d\u00fczenliyor. Bu durumda hapis \u00fc\u00e7 ila on y\u0131l aras\u0131nda belirleniyor ve adli para cezas\u0131 da ekleniyor.<\/p>\n

    Ayr\u0131m a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan TCK 159 da \u00f6nemli: doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, hukuki bir ili\u015fkiye dayanan alaca\u011f\u0131 tahsil amac\u0131yla i\u015flenirse, \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine alt\u0131 aydan bir y\u0131la kadar hapis veya adli para cezas\u0131 veriliyor. Yani kanun, hukuki ili\u015fki i\u00e7inde i\u015flenen doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 da tan\u0131yor; hukuki ili\u015fkinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7u kendili\u011finden ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    Usulde CMK 160 savc\u0131ya maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131rma g\u00f6revi y\u00fckl\u00fcyor. CMK 173\/1’e g\u00f6re su\u00e7tan zarar g\u00f6ren, kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131na tebli\u011fden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7inde sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fine itiraz edebiliyor; h\u00e2kimlik 173\/3 uyar\u0131nca soru\u015fturman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesini isteyebiliyor. Kesin kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 CMK 309’daki kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yolu bulunuyor.<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Karar<\/th>\nOlay<\/th>\nSonu\u00e7<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    11. CD, 02.02.2026<\/td>\nBorsa yat\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 vaadi, 810.000 TL<\/td>\nTakipsizli\u011fe itiraz\u0131n reddi bozuldu<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Ceza Genel Kurulu, 18.02.2026<\/td>\nNevresim sipari\u015fi, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ekler<\/td>\nBeraat eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmadan bozuldu<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    11. CD, 01.07.2026<\/td>\nFiyat teklifinden y\u00fcksek fatura, 17.180 TL<\/td>\n\u00d6deme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in te\u015febb\u00fcs; bozma<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    Su\u00e7 tamamlanmad\u0131ysa ne olur?<\/h2>\n

    Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin 2021\/30480 E., 2026\/7355 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ve 01.07.2026 tarihli karar\u0131 madalyonun \u00f6b\u00fcr y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6steriyor. \u0130ki \u015firket aras\u0131nda fiyat teklifi \u00fczerinde anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ancak d\u00fczenlenen faturalarda birim fiyatlar tekliften y\u00fcksek g\u00f6sterilmi\u015fti. Mahkeme san\u0131klar\u0131 17.180 TL haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131 kabul\u00fcyle nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131ktan mahk\u00fbm etti.<\/p>\n

    Daire, asliye ticaret mahkemesindeki menfi tespit davas\u0131nda al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporuna dikkat \u00e7ekti: \u015firketler aras\u0131nda cari hesap ili\u015fkisi vard\u0131 ve fazladan istenen tutar hi\u00e7 \u00f6denmemi\u015fti. Bu nedenle su\u00e7 te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve TCK 35 uygulanmal\u0131yd\u0131. Faturalar farkl\u0131 tarihlerde kayda girdi\u011fi i\u00e7in zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fckm\u00fc de g\u00f6zetilmeliydi. Zarar do\u011fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde “zarar giderilmedi” gerek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesi de yasal bulunmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

    Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k hukuki ihtilaf yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 okura ne anlat\u0131yor?<\/h2>\n

    Paras\u0131n\u0131 bir yat\u0131r\u0131m veya ticari ili\u015fki i\u00e7inde kaybeden ki\u015fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ilk ders, \u015fik\u00e2yetin “bana borcunu \u00f6demedi” diye de\u011fil, “bana \u015fu yalanla para g\u00f6nderttiler” diye kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fidir. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki ihtilafa kaymas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleyen \u015fey, hileyi g\u00f6steren somut olgulard\u0131r: sahte ihale iddias\u0131, yap\u0131lmayan yat\u0131r\u0131m, ayn\u0131 adresteki paravan \u015firketler gibi.<\/p>\n

    \u015e\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da kararlar tek y\u00f6nl\u00fc de\u011fil. Ger\u00e7ek bir ticari faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, paran\u0131n vaat edilen i\u015fe y\u00f6neldi\u011fini g\u00f6steren belgeler, ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda en g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc savunma arac\u0131d\u0131r. Diyelim ki bir yat\u0131r\u0131m dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 paray\u0131 ger\u00e7ekten borsaya yat\u0131rd\u0131 ve piyasa d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc; hesap hareketleri bunu g\u00f6steriyorsa, ortada doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k de\u011fil zarara u\u011fram\u0131\u015f bir yat\u0131r\u0131m vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Para ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 belgeleyin.<\/strong> G\u00f6nderdi\u011finiz her tutar\u0131n dekontunu ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n hesap bilgilerini bir araya getirin.<\/li>\n
    2. Vaadi yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00e2le getirin.<\/strong> Kazan\u00e7 oran\u0131, yat\u0131r\u0131m arac\u0131 ve ihale gibi iddialar\u0131 i\u00e7eren mesaj, sunum ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri saklay\u0131n.<\/li>\n
    3. \u015eik\u00e2yette hileyi anlat\u0131n.<\/strong> \u00d6denmeyen borcu de\u011fil, sizi para g\u00f6ndermeye ikna eden yalan\u0131 somut olarak a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131n.<\/li>\n
    4. Ara\u015ft\u0131rma talep edin.<\/strong> Hesap ve kripto kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u015firketlerin vergi ve ticaret sicili bilgilerinin istenmesini dilek\u00e7ede belirtin.<\/li>\n
    5. Takipsizli\u011fe s\u00fcresinde itiraz edin.<\/strong> Karar tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7inde, yap\u0131lmayan ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 sayan bir itiraz verin.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n

      Dikkat:<\/strong> Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131, alaca\u011f\u0131n icra veya hukuk mahkemesi yoluyla istenmesine engel de\u011fildir. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n “hukuk yoluna gidin” demesini beklemeden bu yollar\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirin; her yolun s\u00fcresi ayr\u0131ca hesaplanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      Ticari ili\u015fkilerde s\u0131k kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan su\u00e7lar i\u00e7in g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma<\/a> ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek<\/a> rehberlerimize, su\u00e7un genel \u00e7er\u00e7evesi i\u00e7in doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131<\/a> yaz\u0131m\u0131za bak\u0131labilir. Te\u015febb\u00fcs ayr\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in su\u00e7a te\u015febb\u00fcs<\/a> yaz\u0131m\u0131z, s\u00fcre\u00e7 hakk\u0131nda genel bilgi i\u00e7in doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ve ekonomik su\u00e7lar<\/a> sayfam\u0131z incelenebilir.<\/p>\n

      \"Ticari
      \u00dc\u00e7 karar, \u00fc\u00e7 ayr\u0131 ticari g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

      S\u0131k sorulan sorular<\/h2>\n
      \n
      \nAram\u0131zda s\u00f6zle\u015fme var, yine de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k \u015fik\u00e2yeti yapabilir miyim?<\/summary>\n

      Evet. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7u tek ba\u015f\u0131na ortadan kald\u0131rmaz; \u00f6nemli olan, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n sizi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye veya \u00f6demeye hileyle y\u00f6nlendirip y\u00f6nlendirmedi\u011fidir. Bu kararlarda da imzalanm\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ve ticari ili\u015fkiye ra\u011fmen soru\u015fturman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi istendi.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nHukuki ihtilaf ile doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ay\u0131ran \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc nedir?<\/summary>\n

      Kararlara g\u00f6re \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc, hileli davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve paran\u0131n vaat edilen i\u015fe ger\u00e7ekten y\u00f6nelip y\u00f6nelmedi\u011fidir. Bor\u00e7 sonradan \u00f6denemediyse hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, ba\u015ftan var olmayan bir yat\u0131r\u0131m veya ihale anlat\u0131larak para al\u0131nd\u0131ysa doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k g\u00fcndeme gelir. Bunu hesap ve defter kay\u0131tlar\u0131 g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \n\u0130lk aylarda k\u00e2r pay\u0131 \u00f6dendi, bu doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131r m\u0131?<\/summary>\n

      Tek ba\u015f\u0131na kald\u0131rmaz. 11. Ceza Dairesinin karar\u0131nda da \u015f\u00fcphelinin iki \u00fc\u00e7 ay \u00f6deme yapmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na yetmedi. Paran\u0131n ger\u00e7ekten yat\u0131r\u0131ma y\u00f6nlendirilip y\u00f6nlendirilmedi\u011finin hesap kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istendi.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nHi\u00e7 \u00f6deme yapmad\u0131ysam su\u00e7 yine olu\u015fur mu?<\/summary>\n

      Hileli davran\u0131\u015f ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f ama kar\u015f\u0131 taraf hen\u00fcz \u00f6deme yapmam\u0131\u015fsa su\u00e7 te\u015febb\u00fcs a\u015famas\u0131nda kalabilir. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi 01.07.2026 tarihli karar\u0131nda, \u015fi\u015firilmi\u015f faturalar \u00f6denmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in TCK 35’in uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtti. Te\u015febb\u00fcste ceza, TCK 35’e g\u00f6re indirilir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nTicari doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kta uzla\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131l\u0131r m\u0131?<\/summary>\n

      Uzla\u015ft\u0131rmaya tabi su\u00e7lar\u0131 sayan CMK 253\/1-b, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kta yaln\u0131z 157. maddeye yer veriyor; ticari faaliyet s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015flenen 158\/1-h bu listede bulunmuyor. Zarar\u0131n giderilmesi ise TCK 168 \u00fczerinden cezada indirime yol a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n

      \n

      Dayanak mevzuat ve karar<\/p>\n