{"id":2044,"date":"2026-09-28T20:26:04","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:26:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/?p=2044"},"modified":"2026-09-28T20:26:04","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T17:26:04","slug":"polis-savci-dolandiriciligi-yargitay-karari-zorunlu-mudafi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gulsahmutlu.av.tr\/index.php\/2026\/09\/28\/polis-savci-dolandiriciligi-yargitay-karari-zorunlu-mudafi\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK 2026: Kendini Polis veya Savc\u0131 Tan\u0131tan Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kta M\u00fcdafi Zorunlu mu?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Son kontrol:

Kendini telefonda polis, savc\u0131 ya da banka g\u00f6revlisi olarak tan\u0131tan ki\u015filerin yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir davada san\u0131k “avukat istemiyorum” derse mahkeme buna uyabilir mi? \u015eubat 2026’da verilen polis savc\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 bu soruya a\u00e7\u0131k bir cevap veriyor: su\u00e7 \u00fc\u00e7 veya daha fazla ki\u015fiyle birlikte i\u015flenmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131yorsa, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iste\u011fine bak\u0131lmadan m\u00fcdafi atanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu bu sonuca oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla ula\u015ft\u0131 ve kesinle\u015fmi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcnen dokuz y\u0131ll\u0131k bir mahk\u00fbmiyeti bozdu. Karar yaln\u0131zca san\u0131klar\u0131 ilgilendirmiyor. Paras\u0131 al\u0131nan ki\u015fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da dosyan\u0131n y\u0131llar sonra ba\u015ftan g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi anlam\u0131na gelebiliyor. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da karar\u0131, ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde verilen bir Daire karar\u0131yla ve bu su\u00e7ta zarar\u0131n giderilmesine ili\u015fkin g\u00fcncel bir ba\u015fka kararla birlikte ele al\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n

\n

Karar\u0131n k\u00fcnyesi<\/p>\n

\n
Mahkeme<\/dt>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/dd>\n
Esas \/ Karar<\/dt>\n
2025\/22 E., 2026\/59 K.<\/dd>\n
Karar tarihi<\/dt>\n
04.02.2026<\/dd>\n
Konu<\/dt>\n
TCK 158\/1-l ve 158\/3 kapsam\u0131ndaki nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kta CMK 150\/3 uyar\u0131nca zorunlu m\u00fcdafi<\/dd>\n
Sonu\u00e7<\/dt>\n
Bozma (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu)<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n
\nBu yaz\u0131da neler var?<\/summary>\n
    \n
  1. Olay ve su\u00e7lama: hangi su\u00e7tan yarg\u0131land\u0131?<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi, istinaf ve Daire ne karar verdi?<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Polis savc\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Genel Kurulun gerek\u00e7esi<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Bu yakla\u015f\u0131m tek karara m\u0131 dayan\u0131yor?<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nelerdir?<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Zarar\u0131n giderilmesi di\u011fer san\u0131klara da yarar m\u0131?<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Polis savc\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 okur i\u00e7in ne ifade ediyor?<\/a><\/li>\n
  8. S\u0131k sorulan sorular<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/details>\n

    Olay ve su\u00e7lama: hangi su\u00e7tan yarg\u0131land\u0131?<\/h2>\n

    San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 13.12.2018 tarihli iddianameyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Su\u00e7lama, TCK 158\/1-l’de d\u00fczenlenen, ki\u015finin kendisini kamu g\u00f6revlisi ya da banka, sigorta veya kredi kurumu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olarak tan\u0131tmas\u0131 suretiyle i\u015flenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131. \u00d6rne\u011fin kendini polis ya da savc\u0131 olarak tan\u0131tan birinin telefonda “paran\u0131z\u0131 g\u00fcvenli hesaba aktar\u0131n” diyerek para istemesi, bu bentte tarif edilen davran\u0131\u015fa uyar.<\/p>\n

    Genel Kurul karar\u0131nda ma\u011fdurun nas\u0131l arand\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ka\u00e7 ki\u015finin rol ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya ne kadar para kaybedildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131nt\u0131 yer alm\u0131yor. Karar\u0131n oda\u011f\u0131 olay\u0131n kendisi de\u011fil, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n nas\u0131l yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131. Bu nedenle olay anlat\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 karar\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgilerle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 tutuyoruz.<\/p>\n

    Kovu\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda mahkeme, su\u00e7un \u00fc\u00e7 veya daha fazla ki\u015fiyle birlikte i\u015flenmi\u015f olabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek san\u0131\u011fa TCK 158\/3 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ek savunma hakk\u0131 verdi. San\u0131\u011fa haklar\u0131n\u0131n okundu\u011fu, m\u00fcdafi yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011finin hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise m\u00fcdafi istemedi\u011fini ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131 kendisinin yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi kararda yer al\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    \"Polis
    Karar\u0131n \u00f6zeti: m\u00fcdafisiz yarg\u0131lama bozuldu<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi, istinaf ve Daire ne karar verdi?<\/h2>\n

    \u0130stanbul Anadolu 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 04.12.2019 tarihinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131 TCK 158\/1-l ve 158\/3 uyar\u0131nca 9 y\u0131l hapis ve 1.641.000 TL adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131rd\u0131. Hak yoksunlu\u011funa ve cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine de h\u00fckmetti. B\u00fct\u00fcn bu yarg\u0131lama boyunca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131nda bir m\u00fcdafi yoktu.<\/p>\n

    \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 21. Ceza Dairesi 17.03.2020 tarihinde yaln\u0131z vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden d\u00fczeltme yaparak istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu esastan reddetti. Temyiz incelemesini yapan, bug\u00fcn kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan Yarg\u0131tay 15. Ceza Dairesi de 22.02.2021 tarihinde temyiz istemini esastan reddetti. B\u00f6ylece h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fti.<\/p>\n

    Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 14.10.2024 tarihinde bu karara itiraz etti. \u0130tiraza g\u00f6re 158\/1-l i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen alt s\u0131n\u0131r d\u00f6rt y\u0131ld\u0131; 158\/3 gere\u011fi zorunlu yar\u0131 art\u0131r\u0131mla alt s\u0131n\u0131r alt\u0131 y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yordu. Bu durumda CMK 150\/3 uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcdafi atanmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131. Dosyay\u0131 yeniden inceleyen 11. Ceza Dairesi 19.11.2024 tarihinde itiraz\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6rmedi ve dosya Genel Kurula g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n

    Polis savc\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131: Genel Kurulun gerek\u00e7esi<\/h2>\n

    Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k tek bir soruya indirgenmi\u015fti: CMK 150\/3’teki “alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 be\u015f y\u0131ldan fazla” \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fc hesaplan\u0131rken yaln\u0131z temel ceza m\u0131, yoksa h\u00e2kime takdir hakk\u0131 b\u0131rakmayan art\u0131r\u0131m nedenleri de mi dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r? Kanun bu konuda a\u00e7\u0131k de\u011fil.<\/p>\n

    Genel Kurul \u00f6nce savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131 anlat\u0131yor ve m\u00fcdafiyi savunman\u0131n me\u015fru arac\u0131 olarak tan\u0131ml\u0131yor. Ard\u0131ndan TCK 66\/3’e dikkat \u00e7ekiyor: dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 hesaplan\u0131rken daha a\u011f\u0131r cezay\u0131 gerektiren nitelikli h\u00e2ller de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutuluyor. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131nda hesaba kat\u0131lan nitelikli h\u00e2lin, m\u00fcdafi zorunlulu\u011funda g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilmesi adalet ve e\u015fitlik ilkeleriyle ba\u011fda\u015fm\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    “…\u00fc\u00e7 veya daha fazla ki\u015fi ile birlikte i\u015flenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Kanun’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezan\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n be\u015f y\u0131ldan fazla olmas\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak adil ve etkin yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda, istemi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n CMK’n\u0131n 150. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011fa m\u00fcdafi atanmas\u0131nda zorunluluk bulundu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Genel Kurul, 2016’da verilen ve yaln\u0131z temel cezan\u0131n esas al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen kendi kararlar\u0131ndan 2021’de d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de hat\u0131rlat\u0131yor. Karara g\u00f6re i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri kural olarak geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fcyor, ancak hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f yarg\u0131lamalarda dikkate al\u0131n\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    Sonu\u00e7ta itiraz kabul edildi, Daire karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131 ve b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi karar\u0131 savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle bozuldu. Dosya yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Anadolu 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n

    Karar\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir kar\u015f\u0131 oyu var. Bir \u00fcye uzun bir gerek\u00e7e yazd\u0131, alt\u0131 \u00fcye de itiraz\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131ld\u0131. Kar\u015f\u0131 oy yaz\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re 2021’e kadar s\u00fcren istikrarl\u0131 uygulama kanun de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi olmadan terk edildi. Zorunlu m\u00fcdafi eksikli\u011fi mahkemenin kanuna uygun olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir hukuka kesin ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k oldu\u011fundan, bu yorum ge\u00e7mi\u015f \u00e7ok say\u0131da dosyay\u0131 yeniden a\u00e7abilir. \u00dcye, sorunun i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yoluyla \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fini yazd\u0131. Kanaatimizce bu uyar\u0131, karar\u0131n uygulamadaki etkisini tartarken ciddiye al\u0131nmal\u0131.<\/p>\n

    Bu yakla\u015f\u0131m tek karara m\u0131 dayan\u0131yor?<\/h2>\n

    Hay\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/40524 E., 2026\/7381 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ve 01.07.2026 tarihli karar\u0131nda ayn\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcy\u00fc uygulad\u0131. Bu dosyada ilk derece mahkemesi san\u0131klar\u0131 158\/1-l ve 158\/3 uyar\u0131nca 7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis ve 150.000 TL adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131rm\u0131\u015f, Sakarya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Ceza Dairesi istinaf\u0131 esastan reddetmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

    Daire, m\u00fcdafii bulunmayan san\u0131klardan biri i\u00e7in zorunlu m\u00fcdafi atanmamas\u0131n\u0131 CMK 188\/1 ve 289\/1-e’ye ayk\u0131r\u0131 buldu ve bunu 289\/1-h kapsam\u0131nda hukuka kesin ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olarak niteledi. Karar, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n sair y\u00f6nleri incelenmeden bozulmas\u0131yla sonu\u00e7land\u0131. \u0130ki karar birlikte okundu\u011funda, 158\/3’\u00fcn uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosyalarda m\u00fcdafi zorunlulu\u011funun 2026 itibar\u0131yla hem Genel Kurul hem Daire taraf\u0131ndan arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

    \"Nitelikli
    Dosyada m\u00fcdafi eksikli\u011fini kontrol etme<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
    \n

    Pratik bir ad\u0131m:<\/strong> Elinizdeki evrak\u0131 tarih s\u0131ras\u0131na koyun ve ceza dosyas\u0131 ile ilgili sorular\u0131n\u0131z\u0131 not edin. B\u00fcroyla yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131z ilk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede bu liste, dosyan\u0131n k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede de\u011ferlendirilmesini sa\u011flar. Randevu ve adres i\u00e7in b\u00fcronun ileti\u015fim bilgileri<\/a> sayfas\u0131na g\u00f6z atabilirsiniz.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nelerdir?<\/h2>\n

    TCK 158\/1-l, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ki\u015finin kendisini kamu g\u00f6revlisi veya banka, sigorta ya da kredi kurumu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olarak tan\u0131tmas\u0131 veya bu kurumlarla ili\u015fkili oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi suretiyle i\u015flenmesini d\u00fczenliyor. Ceza \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ldan on y\u0131la kadar hapis ve be\u015f bin g\u00fcne kadar adli para cezas\u0131. Ayn\u0131 f\u0131kran\u0131n son c\u00fcmlesine g\u00f6re (l) bendinde hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 d\u00f6rt y\u0131ldan, adli para cezas\u0131 su\u00e7tan elde edilen menfaatin iki kat\u0131ndan az olamaz.<\/p>\n

    TCK 158\/3’e g\u00f6re 157 ve 158’deki su\u00e7lar \u00fc\u00e7 veya daha fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan birlikte i\u015flenirse ceza yar\u0131 oran\u0131nda, su\u00e7 i\u015flemek i\u00e7in kurulmu\u015f bir \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flenirse bir kat art\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yor. CMK 150\/3 ise alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 be\u015f y\u0131ldan fazla hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7larda, istem aranmaks\u0131z\u0131n m\u00fcdafi g\u00f6revlendirilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Durum<\/th>\nHapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131<\/th>\nZorunlu m\u00fcdafi (bu kararlara g\u00f6re)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k (TCK 157)<\/td>\n1 y\u0131l<\/td>\nHay\u0131r, istem h\u00e2linde atan\u0131r<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Kamu g\u00f6revlisi gibi tan\u0131tma (TCK 158\/1-l)<\/td>\n4 y\u0131l<\/td>\nTek ba\u015f\u0131na hay\u0131r<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    158\/1-l ve \u00fc\u00e7 veya daha fazla ki\u015fi (158\/3)<\/td>\n6 y\u0131l<\/td>\nEvet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    158\/1-l ve \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyeti (158\/3)<\/td>\n8 y\u0131l<\/td>\nEvet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da not d\u00fc\u015fmek gerekiyor: CMK 253\/1-b listesinde yaln\u0131z basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k (m. 157) yer al\u0131yor. 158’deki nitelikli h\u00e2ller uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdur ile san\u0131k aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkide belirleyici ara\u00e7, TCK 168’deki etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k oluyor.<\/p>\n

    Zarar\u0131n giderilmesi di\u011fer san\u0131klara da yarar m\u0131?<\/h2>\n

    Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin 2026\/795 E., 2026\/6814 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ve 22.06.2026 tarihli karar\u0131 bu soruya cevap veriyor. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde 158\/1-l kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada san\u0131klardan biri kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda kat\u0131lan\u0131n zarar\u0131n\u0131 tamamen gidermi\u015f ve 168\/2 uyar\u0131nca yar\u0131 oran\u0131nda indirim alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Di\u011fer san\u0131k ise bu indirimden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

    Daire, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yoluyla gelen dosyada \u015fu ilkeyi benimsedi: i\u015ftirak h\u00e2linde i\u015flenen su\u00e7ta san\u0131klardan biri zarar\u0131 giderdi\u011finde, buna kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmayan di\u011fer san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda da etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k uygulanmal\u0131. Ayn\u0131 kararda, gerek\u00e7ede 158\/1-l denildi\u011fi h\u00e2lde h\u00fckm\u00fcn 158\/1-f \u00fczerinden kurulmas\u0131 da ayr\u0131ca kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu.<\/p>\n

    Polis savc\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 okur i\u00e7in ne ifade ediyor?<\/h2>\n

    San\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan karar, m\u00fcdafi istememi\u015f olman\u0131n hakk\u0131n kayb\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor. 158\/3 uygulanm\u0131\u015f bir mahk\u00fbmiyette m\u00fcdafi bulunmam\u0131\u015fsa bu, kanun yollar\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilecek a\u011f\u0131r bir usul sorunudur. Diyelim ki bir ki\u015fi, telefonda savc\u0131 gibi konu\u015fan ekibe para toplayan “kurye” olarak yarg\u0131lan\u0131yor ve iddianamede \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fiden s\u00f6z ediliyor. Bu ki\u015fiye baro arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla m\u00fcdafi g\u00f6revlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

    Paras\u0131 al\u0131nan ki\u015fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tablo biraz daha karma\u015f\u0131k. Usul hatas\u0131 nedeniyle bozulan bir dosyada yarg\u0131lama yeniden yap\u0131l\u0131r; bu da s\u00fcrecin uzamas\u0131 demektir. Kat\u0131lan s\u0131fat\u0131yla davaya kat\u0131lmak, dosyay\u0131 izlemek ve tazmin tekliflerini de\u011ferlendirmek bu a\u015famada \u00f6nem kazan\u0131r. Haz\u0131rl\u0131k a\u015famas\u0131ndaki haklar i\u00e7in emniyette ifade vermek<\/a> rehberimize, su\u00e7un genel \u00e7er\u00e7evesi i\u00e7in doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131<\/a> yaz\u0131m\u0131za bak\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Dikkat:<\/strong> Bu kararlar yorum de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine dayan\u0131yor, yeni bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne de\u011fil. Genel Kurula g\u00f6re i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri kural olarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmleri etkilemez. Kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir dosyada bu yola ba\u015fvurulup ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131, dosyan\u0131n hangi a\u015famada oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      \n
    1. Su\u00e7 vasf\u0131n\u0131 kontrol edin.<\/strong> \u0130ddianamede veya ek savunmada TCK 158\/3 an\u0131l\u0131yor mu, bak\u0131n.<\/li>\n
    2. M\u00fcdafi durumunu belirleyin.<\/strong> San\u0131\u011f\u0131n se\u00e7ti\u011fi ya da barodan atanm\u0131\u015f bir m\u00fcdafi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tutanaklardan teyit edin.<\/li>\n
    3. Savunman\u0131n nas\u0131l al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131n.<\/strong> Savunma ve ek savunman\u0131n m\u00fcdafi huzurunda al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kontrol edin.<\/li>\n
    4. Son oturumu inceleyin.<\/strong> H\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmada m\u00fcdafiin haz\u0131r olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit edin.<\/li>\n
    5. Kanun yolunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcn.<\/strong> Eksiklik varsa istinaf veya temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtin.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Kanun yolu s\u00fcreleri i\u00e7in ceza muhakemesinde istinaf<\/a> yaz\u0131m\u0131z, birden fazla ki\u015finin rol ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosyalardaki sorumluluk ayr\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in su\u00e7a i\u015ftirak<\/a> yaz\u0131m\u0131z yol g\u00f6sterebilir. Bu t\u00fcr dosyalarda izlenen s\u00fcre\u00e7 hakk\u0131nda doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ve ekonomik su\u00e7lar<\/a> sayfam\u0131zda genel bilgi bulunuyor.<\/p>\n

      \"Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k
      Alt s\u0131n\u0131r ve zorunlu m\u00fcdafi<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

      S\u0131k sorulan sorular<\/h2>\n
      \n
      \nTelefonda kendini savc\u0131 tan\u0131t\u0131p para isteyen ki\u015fi hangi maddeden yarg\u0131lan\u0131r?<\/summary>\n

      Genellikle TCK 158\/1-l kapsam\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131ktan yarg\u0131lan\u0131r. Bu bentte hapis cezas\u0131 d\u00f6rt y\u0131ldan on y\u0131la kadard\u0131r ve adli para cezas\u0131 elde edilen menfaatin iki kat\u0131ndan az olamaz. Olayda bili\u015fim sistemi veya banka ara\u00e7 olarak kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa 158\/1-f de g\u00fcndeme gelebilir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nSan\u0131k m\u00fcdafi istemedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylerse mahkeme ne yapmal\u0131?<\/summary>\n

      158\/3 nedeniyle alt s\u0131n\u0131r be\u015f y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015f\u0131yorsa, Genel Kurulun bu karar\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iste\u011fine bak\u0131lmadan m\u00fcdafi g\u00f6revlendirilmelidir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n “savunmam\u0131 kendim yapar\u0131m” demesi bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmaz; savunma ve son oturum m\u00fcdafi huzurunda yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nBu t\u00fcr doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kta uzla\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131labilir mi?<\/summary>\n

      Hay\u0131r, CMK 253\/1-b yaln\u0131z basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (TCK 157) uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131na al\u0131yor. 158’deki nitelikli h\u00e2ller bu listede yok. Zarar\u0131n giderilmesi ise TCK 168 \u00fczerinden cezada indirim sa\u011flayabilir; k\u0131smi \u00f6demede ma\u011fdurun r\u0131zas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nParam\u0131 san\u0131klardan biri \u00f6derse di\u011ferleri de indirim al\u0131r m\u0131?<\/summary>\n

      Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin 22.06.2026 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re, zarar\u0131 gideren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6demesine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmayan di\u011fer san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda da etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu, ma\u011fdurun zarar\u0131n\u0131n bir kez kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n birden fazla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cezas\u0131n\u0131 etkileyebilece\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

      \nKarar kesinle\u015fmi\u015f eski dosyalar\u0131 otomatik olarak a\u00e7ar m\u0131?<\/summary>\n

      Hay\u0131r. Genel Kurul, i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinin kural olarak geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmedi\u011fini ve kesinle\u015fmi\u015f kararlar\u0131 kendili\u011finden etkilemedi\u011fini belirtiyor. Bu dosyada sonu\u00e7, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine do\u011fdu. Ba\u015fka bir dosyada hangi yolun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu somut duruma g\u00f6re incelenmelidir.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n

      \n

      Dayanak mevzuat ve karar<\/p>\n